Africason
Education
Culture
Black history
African history
Ancient Egyptian
African-American
African people
The lost history
Bob Marley
Kwame Nkrumah
Marcus Garvey
History of slave trade
Education and colonialism
Neo colonialism
Ancient Africa
What is Satan
The dead end of African literature
Intellectual slavery PDF
African languages
Miseducation
Dr. Amos Wilson
Kaba Hiawatha Kamene
John G. Jackson
Cheikh Anta Diop
Yosef Ben Jochannan
John H. Clarke
Ivan Van Sertima
Africa son
African son
What is Satan? The biggest secret in the world Pre-order my upcoming book titled: What is Satan? The biggest secret in the world Dear friends I am sorry that you haven't seen me post new articles for a while. The reason is that I am busy writing a book. The book's name is: What is Satan? The biggest secret in the world. I am currently devoting all my time and effort in research and reading towards completing the book, so research and reading is all I do these days and have no time left to write new articles. However, in the middle of the book, I realized that the story is bigger than I imagined when I started. The story is very enlightening and it's huge! When finished, this book would free Africans from foreign religions. It would tell the history and evolution of God from out of Africa to the rest of the world. We Africans invented the very concept of God!! We Africans invented the very concept of a savior, messiah, redeemer thousands of years before there was any relig...
The commonwealth of nations is a colonial hangover. It's a legacy of enslavement of Africa
This message is attention to the following commonwealth countries: Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Botswana, Brunei, Cameroon, Cyprus, Dominica, Ghana, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Kenya, Kiribati, Lesotho, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nauru, Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Tanzania, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia.
Before I begin, let me make it clear the United Kingdom together with Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa own the commonwealth and aren’t part of the addressee, except black South Africans forced into the unholy marriage with slave masters. It’s very important you know that Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa were lands already explored and inhabited by black people, thousands of years before the British learned how to build their first ship. Black people already voyaged and explored the whole world long before Europeans!. The original inhabitants of Canada, Australia, New Zealand were black people.
This is a picture of original Australians and New Zealand people a.k.a Aboriginals
Sheer acts of genocide were used by the British to wipe out the indigenous black population wherever they went. So, the British exterminated the indigenous black population in Canada, Australia, New Zealand. They also tried their best to wipe out black people in South Africa, but the tenacious Zulu warriors, coupled with the large black population in the African mainland meant that there was always an unending supply of African warriors fighting off British invaders. After the British killed millions of South Africans and seeing there was no way they could exterminate them like in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, they gave up and initiated their plan B- integration & slavery. This is the only reason South Africa is not a white majority country today. But Canada, Australia, and New Zealand weren’t as lucky as South Africa since they were very far from the African mainland. The descendants of the original black populations in Canada, Australia, New Zealand are still there today, but they’re very few in number now, and therefore, have been pushed to the background, since they’re very poor, defeated, seen as second-class citizens, and have no political muscle whatsoever to be heard. Many of them retreated into the forests many years ago and are still in hiding today; because they are still running for fear of being killed by the British. They have no idea the genocide has stopped many years ago. But you can’t blame them; because they were born hiding, and must have been told by their parents they must keep hiding in the woods in order not to get killed.
It is, therefore, wrong to include Canada, Australia, and New Zealand in a message I intend to send to enslaved commonwealth nations. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand as it is today, are direct descendants of British settlers and were never enslaved. Indeed, the British queen is still the head of state in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
Don’t get me wrong, though, by assuming the rest of the Commonwealth nations were whites. As I said earlier, black people already explored the whole world long before Europeans. Indeed, when Christopher Columbus arrived the Americas, he met the native Indians and black people who’ve been living there thousands of years before him!. I simply wanted to point out Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, because they’re seen today as originally white nations when that’s not the case historically. Of course, almost all the rest of the commonwealth nations remain a black majority nation today, but the original black inhabitants were mostly exterminated and replaced with African imports. See the lost history. Why black history was stolen.
The mind of a slave master, the mind of a terrorist
Why did slavery happen? What were white people thinking?
Till the early 1900's, the European philosophy; especially Britain had always been that slavery was justified, and that there was nothing wrong enslaving black people. This view is reflected in all areas of their life. In 1849, when the call for the abolition of slavery was gaining ground in Europe, a British man named Thomas Carlyle published an essay titled “the occasional discourse on the negro question” in which he appealed to Europeans that it was a wrong idea to stop enslaving black people. Therefore, he asked for a return to full-scale slavery and he justified it.
According to him ‘’white people should rule black people”,
just like those who know rules those who don’t know,
just like the educated rules the uneducated, just like masters have servants,
just like the strong control the weak,
just like men marry women,
just like the hawk prey on chickens
just like lions eat antelopes,
just like antelopes eat grass, e.t.c.
As you can see, Thomas Carlyle believed slavery was natural and that Europeans were mandated to enslave black people. He believed Britain have right to enslave black people and that abolition of slavery was a wrong idea.
The article was a hit across Europe because it appealed to British philosophy and to the viewpoint of other European slave owners.
Interestingly, Thomas Carlyle wasn’t alone in this view. Till the 1800's, European and American churches and priests also widely held the view that “slavery was ordained by God”. Bible passages were often being quoted to rebellious slaves to remind them to obey their masters, as it was the will of God for them to be enslaved. Popular bible passages used by European slave traders and missionaries includes the below:-
Ephesians 6 5:8 New International Version. Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not people, because you know that the Lord will reward each one for whatever good they do, whether they are slave or free. 1 Corinthians 7:20:22 New International Version. Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them. Were you a slave when you were called? Don’t let it trouble you- although if you can gain your freedom, do so. For the one who was a slave when called to faith in the Lord is the Lord’s freed person; similarly, the one who was free when called is Christ’s slave. Colossians 3 22:25 New International Version. Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord. Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as a reward. It is the Lord Christ you are serving. Anyone who does wrong will be repaid for their wrongs, and there is no favoritism. 1 Peter 2 18:20 New International Version. Slaves, in reverent fear of God submit yourselves to your masters, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. For it is commendable if someone bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because they are conscious of God. But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God.
This view was also reflected even in science. In 1859 (ten years after Thomas Carlyle) another British man named Charles Darwin justified slavery scientifically in his book “the origin of species” in which he said categorically that nature is blind and that all species of plants and animals exist as a matter of survival of the fittest- natural selection. Totally in accord with Thomas Carlyle’s philosophy!. However, let me state here that the question isn’t whether natural selection is responsible for the survival of the fittest, but using it to justify slavery is what is wrong. Because we as human beings have a conscience. We are not trees!!.. I need to point this out, because, Winston Churchill and many others did justify slavery on that basis. I will get to that soon.
Charles Darwin also justified slavery in his book, the origin of species
Look at the book opening pages (click to enlarge) on the area circled in red and you’ll see Darwin categorically said “the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life”.
Why did he say that? Because at the time the book was written, race was the biggest topic of the day and he wanted to throw in his support (though subliminally) that the white race was the favoured race in face of horrendous slavery.
Darwin’s book was also a hit both in the science world and the political life of Britain, and the other colonialists. It’s a pity most black people don’t know this, but from then on slavery was viewed by the British as a survival of the fittest and not as a crime!. In fact, Darwin boosted the morale of the colonialists across Europe, Africa, Asia, and America, and indeed helped inspire people like Thomas Carlyle and Churchill. Later, Charles Darwin's cousin named Francis was also inspired and he founded the science of Eugenics, which was originally meant to create a master white race. Suddenly, scientific racism and social Darwinism emerged, all justifying slavery. In America, they formed the American society of eugenics and in Sweden, they formed the Institute of racial biology. All these were later to inspire Adolf Hitler to mass murder non-German persons in Germany.
The Birth of The Commonwealth of Nations
By the end of the Second World War, Britain had been severely weakened by the wars and was no longer in position to rule their colonies by direct military occupation, therefore, they began planning a new world order in which they would rule their colonies from remote. They began planning a new world order in which they’ll control banking, economy, education, politics, and government, of all their colonies from Buckingham palace, London. It’s not a surprise then that at the end of the second world war when Winston Churchill talked about the new world order that was being planned, he indeed echoed the philosophy of Thomas Carlyle when he said "the governments of the world must be entrusted to the satisfied nations. If the world’s government were in the hands of hungry nations there will always be danger. Our power place us above the rest, we are like rich men dwelling at peace within their habitation and therefore our right to rule. That's the way the world ought to be and will be”.
Winston Churchill British prime minister; 1940 to 1945 and again from 1951 to 1955
Churchill adds "The rich men of the rich societies must rule the world, competing among themselves for the greater share of the spoils (colonies). And they are to be assisted by the rich men of the hungry nations”. Others are supposed to serve or suffer. In 1919, Churchill advocated for the use of chemical weapons against Kurds and Afghans. When humane officials raised concern over the use of chemical gas against their colonies, Churchill said: "I cannot understand this squeamishness about the use of gas,". So, he wrote in a memo during his role as minister for war and air. He continued "I am strongly in favor of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes,". He added: "gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effect on most of those affected." In 1937, shortly before starving millions of Indians to death, he told a commission of inquiry, "I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place."
In 1943, while boasting about how he starved 10 million people to death in Bengal, India, Churchill said: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion. The famine was their own fault for breeding like rabbits.” When few humane British officials wrote to him in London, pointing out that his policies were causing needless loss of lives in India, he replied, ''Why hasn’t Gandhi died yet''?
Winston Churchill made above comments as he was struggling to hang on to the then fast collapsing British empire.
As I said earlier, Britain had been weakened by the world wars and it dawned on them England wasn't in position any longer to rule all their colonies by direct military occupation. They must find other ways of ruling their colonies across the world. Eventually, they figured out they needed to install puppet governments they would continue to control from Buckingham palace, London.
It became very important they do so because even by the late 1800's, rebellion had begun in almost all British colonies across the world. The indigenous people had begun demanding freedom from occupation and slavery. The signs were there in all the colonized nations and the slave masters knew their days were numbered. The situation was made worse after soldiers from colonized nations, who fought alongside Britain in the second world war received no rewards after the war. Veteran soldiers became recalcitrant and helped worsen the already growing agitation for freedom by the indigenous people.
The British then began a sort of a town hall meeting to calm down nerves in their colonies. It was in one of such meeting in 1884 in Australia that a British colonial administrator named Lord Rosebery, described the changing British Empire as a "Commonwealth of Nations."
In 1931, the “British Commonwealth of Nations" was formed, not as a decolonization strategy, but as a new model of slavery in the new world order in which Britain planned to rule their colonies in absentia.
It is very important you understand it took Britain at least between 1884 to 1931 to finally form the British Commonwealth of nations. It took them 47 years to come up with the scheme!. There’s always a time lapse between policy formulation and application, so you have no idea what they’re planning today.
This little historical introduction above is enough to make it clear even to the dumbest man or woman in any former British colony that the commonwealth wasn’t formed for our interests.
As you can see, the commonwealth was originally called ''the British Commonwealth'' and that's exactly what it is till today!. It is still the British Commonwealth, not your commonwealth!. The meaning is in the name, and the name is in the meaning!. It was only renamed in 1949, and the purpose for renaming is to conceal the true meaning, to enhance their deceit, to fool you the more. You don’t co-own the colonies with Britain!. The Commonwealth is a remnant British colonial institution comprising all black nations enslaved by Britain. Therefore, the commonwealth clearly isn't there for your interest, but in the interest of Britain.
The Commonwealth should be abolished because it is an outdated legacy of the British Empire that serves no real purpose other than to honor Britain. The commonwealth serves only to bolster Britain’s sense of importance in the world and to make it appear that it’s monarch still has a role in the modern world. This is a dead empire!.
William; heir to the British throne being worshiped in Nauru by modern slaves
Does this picture look to you like Nauru is a free people?
Britain has done it’s best!. Black people, its time to get your nations out of the commonwealth!!. It is the logical thing to do!!.
The Commonwealth should be abolished, because the British Empire was founded upon slavery, colonial aggression, exploitation, and should be repudiated, rather than celebrated in any form through the continuity the Commonwealth symbolizes. True independent nations should not be made to congregate based on a legacy of slavery, nor be made to feel or think Anglo-centric as that in itself is still slavery- mental slavery.
William and wife; heir to the British throne being worshiped in Nauru by modern slaves
Does this picture look to you like these are free black people? Come on!!
The Commonwealth should be abolished, because it has no clear role and mission, except sustaining the legacy of slavery and colonization of black people. It confers no trade privileges upon its members, does not coordinate their defense or foreign policy, and lacks both the budget and the executive authority to make a practical difference in the world. The periodic meetings of the Commonwealth Heads of Government are at best a talking-shop and at worst an expensive junket. It would be far better for its members to commit their attention to reclaiming their cultures, languages, history, self-worth, and dignity that were destroyed by the British. Today, the so-called independent nations under the commonwealth still have English language as their official language; whereas their various native languages are pushed to the background. Some members even have their native languages going into extinction.
If indeed the Commonwealth nations were free, the first thing they would have done is go back to speaking their various native languages, because we certainly had our own native languages before we met Europeans.
And, that reminds me, Britain itself was also under occupation by Rome, Germany, Scandinavians, and France, at various times in their national life. Once upon a time, Britain was also under occupation!. In their times of captivity they spoke Latin, Greek, Scandinavian languages, and French; depending on the occupying force. But when Britain regained it’s freedom, they banned foreign languages in the entire British isle and adopted their own native English as their official language. The year was 1362, and it was only then that English became an official language. If there's any country in the world that should speak a foreign language, it should be Britain, because more languages have influenced Britain than any other country. Yet, they speak their native English. Therefore, Britain itself has proved that true independent nations will never speak the language of foreigners!. How then do you claim to be independent nations, when English remain your official language?
Watch below videos for a brief history of English language. It’s only 45 minutes all.
Discover the History of English
The evolution of English language
The history of English in 10 minutes
The origin of English language
It is very worrying there’re still so-called independent countries that remain member of a remnant of slavery, 85 years after it was formed. But it took Britain itself just 23 years to exit the European Union!. Why should any independent nation continue as a Commonwealth member; when Britain itself is exiting the European Union?
Most important; do you know what gives Britain the audacity to exit the European Union? Answer: Because part of the new world order was to re-invent slavery in former colonies in the future. Remember, FUTURE here means anything from 1931 to eternity.
Britain sees it’s former colonies as substitutes in a football match, like an asset that it’s usefulness could be rediscovered in future. That’s the real reason the commonwealth was formed!. The commonwealth was formed as a launch pad for future colonialism. It was formed to make sure they retain their legacy and to remain in control of their spoils forever, because, again they believe “the white race is the favored race to rule black people” till eternity. They still hold this belief today, otherwise, the commonwealth wouldn’t exist.
Actually, the queen of England has not stopped being the head of the commonwealth or head of slate in some former British colonies. As at the time of writing this article, the queen of England remain the head of state in the following countries:- Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu.
In above countries, the queen remain the head of state and a high commissioner's full title is thus: High Commissioner for Her Majesty's Government in [Country].
Queen Elizabeth: Head of state of Barbados on a state visit
The queen of England is still head of state in over 20 other black nations
For example; in Barbados, the Queen is titled as Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Barbados, or simply the Queen of Barbados. And the Barbados high commissioner's full title is: High Commissioner for Her Majesty's Government in Barbados.
This proves beyond doubt the commonwealth member nations are not a congregation of independent countries after all. If they were independent nations, they would have together sought the dethronement of the queen in member states.
Well, you may say; but the queen is not the head of state in Nigeria or Ghana or Zambia, e.t.c. On that argument, I’ll like you know that ”In the slavery of the 21st century, don’t expect a chain on your hands. Don’t expect a chain on your legs either”. The chain would be on your mind.
What we have over the decades is a commonwealth of nations that had been put in hibernation while the British work out a perfect modern way to return it’s colonies to 21st slavery.
For decades, there’ve been clandestine cults of European white supremacists, headed by people like Tony Blair, working assiduously to re-invent slavery in former British colonies. If you do your research, you’ll already see this since Mr. Blair left office, in that the only countries he deems fit to visit are former British colonies. And he’s there to promote a new Britain & former colonies partnership.
Blair in Nigeria
Blair in Sri Lanka
Blair in Rwanda
Blair has also been to Azerbaijan, Sierra Leone, and many more former British colonies after leaving office as British prime minister. You have to ask yourself; what is Tony Blair looking for in third world countries after leaving office?
Like Thomas Carlyle, Blair belongs to a cult of elite white supremacists who believes it was a huge mistake allowing independence in former British colonies. He believes slavery would have been sustained till today, knowing what they know now. Therefore, his school of thought passionately wants a return to some sort of slavery by 2050. What Mr. Blair and Co want to achieve in the coming years is the type of economic control France continue to exert on 14 of it's former colonies. See How France Continue to Enslave 14 African Countries.
Countries like Gambia, Zimbabwe, saw the handwriting on the wall and decided to exit the commonwealth before it is too late. It is such a pity Rwanda and Mozambique have no iota of idea what they’ve bought into. It is such a shame two African countries opted to join a group of member states of enslaved nations; when countries like Hong Kong opted out instead!.
Well, you may ask; how do they want to enslave former colonies again? My answer to you is; you’re already being enslaved intellectually. You’re already being enslaved economically. You’re already being enslaved technologically. In short, if by now you cannot figure out why the commonwealth should be abolished, you’re mentally a slave!. Again, “In the slavery of the 21st century, don’t expect a chain on your hands. Don’t expect a chain on your legs either”. The chain would be on your mind.
The chain would be on your mind; therefore, you need to know this:-
After exiting the European Union, Britain is about to unleash a clandestine policy to re-invent slavery in their former colonies. This would come in various formats; example;
(1). Liberalized visa application to encourage tourism from third world countries, cause they need your money in Britain: Britain have all of a sudden recently shortened their visa processing time in Nigeria from 1 month to 1 day.
(2). Controlling education: the British Council has recently shown interest to begin cooperation with educationists and scholars in Nigeria and other third world countries to indoctrinate them on what and what not to teach in schools. Clearly, this’s a long-term policy to begin brainwashing educationists in Nigeria.
(3). Unsolicited scholarship offers from hundreds of mushroom UK universities: They want as many people as possible from third world countries to come study in the UK but there's a reason for that in secret. While on the surface it may appear like ''charity'' but in reality that's the scheme they use to source professional cheap labour force from third world countries to fill their labour market need in Britain, thereby systematically depleting third world countries the professionals we need to develop. Whereas you may see it as ''aid'' at face value but they use the scheme to fish out the 1% finest brains from their former colonies around the world whom they retain in Britain. Once they've availed themselves of the finest brains, the rest could be deported back to wherever they came from. And they do this from generation to generation, thereby maintaining a highly trained intelligent work force that should have been in Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, etc.
So, when you see those scholarship offers coming out of Britain, be wary because in reality it is actually a 21st century model of exploitation happening in your own eyes. Just go to their embassies and you'll see that those Africans with potentials get the longest visa duration. It is called brain-drain. Brain-drain is the reason you have more qualified Nigerian doctors in the US and UK alone than the entire African continent. In the US they even have a program called the NEXT initiative set up to achieve the same purpose. If you sit down and think about it for a moment, you'll realize the world's system of things is structured to keep us perpetually dependent.
(4). Strengthening ties with the commonwealth member nations: this would include predatory trade treaties to be unleashed on former colonies. Member nations would be persuaded to ship cheaply to Britain and buy at expensive pounds sterling.
(5). Bogus awards from the queen or other UK interests: Awards may come to you; such as ''African man of the year'' or ''best African author of the year'' or ''exceptional African kid of the year'' or other sorts of rubbish. Such awards are meant to buy your loyalty, have you think Britain, and make you a role model for teeming African youths to follow, thereby, having the same process repeat itself forever. It has been a strategic British policy as far back as 1445 AD in the Americas, even in West Africa. In 1897 AD the British tried giving a bogus award to Oba Ovoranmwen, the king of Bini kingdom, who wisely rejected such award as unnecessary.
The
bottom line: it doesn't matter in what guise any so called ''charity'' from
Britain but the ultimate goal is to take wealth from their former
colonies back to Britain as it has always been since 1600. Be wary when you begin to see those type of policies coming out of Britain in the coming years. Be warned!. They fooled our ancestors before!!.
Remember, Britain has tried exploiting Asia, but it didn't work as Asians are wiser now. They've tried the Americas to no avail as France, the US, Spain, and Portugal already have the entire place to themselves. They've tried to control the European Union; it didn't work either, so they decided to exit the EU instead.
Now, their only hope is turn to Africa, the dumb continent where people have been brainwashed beyond repair, the same continent that made them wealthy before. I’m not forgetting the other colonies in South America and Asia Pacific- the same people that are dumb enough to be used, time and time again, the only colonies where people have been brainwashed beyond repair like Africa.
I think the commonwealth should be abolished as it has out-lived it's purpose of enslaving third world countries.
Finally, let me remind you that Hong Kong was also a former British colony up to the 80's. But, do you know what China been doing since then?. China has been removing anything Britain from Hong Kong!. Everything from re-engineering the minds of Hong Kong people to educate them that they're not British!!. Educating them to think like Chinese, live like Chinese, eat like Chinese, learn like Chinese, be a Chinese!. Just be in your own blood!. Even streets that used to have English names have been changed to Chinese name!!.
China has totally cut off from western control and is indeed inspiring other Asian countries to do the same. This is how living people behave!!.
Imagine our ancestors and direct victims of slavery and colonialism wake up today to discover to their shock we're still under an umbrella body of enslaved nations!. African leaders and elites should come to their senses and start boycotting the commonwealth and any other institution the west had put up to continue to put us in a yoke. The queen of England will never want to have anything to do with you unless Britain had USED YOU before or PLANS TO USE YOU in future. Example, see how Britain and the CIA fooled Wole Soyinka and Chinua Achebe to destroy African languages in literature
Remember, the same Britain that wants to strengthen the commonwealth is the same Britain that is planning to exit the European Union because they know the EU doesn't allow them to be ''just British''. And, I would like to ask you; if Britain can contemplate leaving the European Union, why should any nation still remain a member of the commonwealth? Are we blacks more related to Britain than Britain is to other European nations? Why commonwealth; when Britain itself is exiting the European Union? If the European Union is not good for Britain; why should the Commonwealth be good for Africa?
Totally agree. The Commonwealth should go the way of Empire. The younger generations no longer need the memory of Empire or the concept of Commonwealth to achieve, they can do this through education and hard work. Poor British people also spent centuries fighting for justice and equality. Our ancestors had their masters elite boots on their necks keeping them down.. Only the rich were/are privileged and, as in the past, are totally out of touch with all the citizens who make up this island. Even though this tiny island ruled half the known world it didn't raise their own citizens out of the gutter and poverty. We did that for ourselves, we rose up and demanded our rights. Our determination not to be slaves to the masters set us free. We gave hope to generation after generation and our young people can rise to a personal greatness. Today is today and yesturday is a constant reminder of colonialism. If they gave the British people a vote I'm sure they would vote to leave the Commonwealth. It is built on power and evil and we must destroy it. It's totally irrelevant to the young in our country today. We are not our ancestors.
Jesus Christ was a black man- according to the bible Before I begin, let me say this article is not about religion, but about history. I am not a religious person, I am not interested in religion. It's high time black people got to begin un-learning lot of the information packed into our minds courtesy of long years of slavery and colonialism. It is time for the black race to rise and claim what is ours. History has been distorted extensively to downplay the contributions of black people to humanity. One glaring distortion is about the character called Jesus Christ in the bible, whom the ancient artists drew as a black man, ancient sculptors carved him as a black man, and even the bible itself described him as a black man in many passages. Before I go further, let me inform you that if you're a serious seeker and you're interested in digging deeper for the whole truth and nothing but the truth, no matter where it may lead to, then you'll need to first find out What...
EXPOSED!. How The World Bank and IMF Riped-Off Poor African Countries Over the Years. Deep Revelation! Impoverishing a Continent: The World Bank and IMF in Africa. By Asad Ismi Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives About the author Asad Ismi is a writer on international politics specializing in U.S. policy towards the Third World and the role of Canadian corporations there. The author of 90 articles, seven reports and a book, he has been published in 21 magazines including CCPA Monitor, Z Magazine, Covert Action Quarterly, Briarpatch, and This Magazine. He has written reports for the Canadian Auto Workers, Canadian Labour Congress, Communications, Energy and Paper Workers Union, Mining Watch Canada, the Halifax Initiative Coalition and the NGO Working Group on the EDC. His reports include the ground-breaking Profiting from Repression: Canadian Investment in and Trade with Colombia. He is winner of a 2003 Project Censored Award for his article “The Ravaging of Afr...
Role of Christian missionaries in the colonization of East Africa Christian missionaries in East Africa (1). Missionaries signed treaties which were later used by colonialists to take over colonies e.g. Tucker, a British Missionary interpreted the 1900 Buganda Agreement to the regents of Kabaka Daudi Chwa II. This led to loss of political, economic and social powers to the British protectorate government. Sir Harry John stone who signed on behalf of the British government confessed that; “I John stone shall be bound to acknowledge the assistance offered to me by the missionaries especially the CMS. Without their assistance on my side, I do not think Uganda’s chiefs would agree to the treaty which practically places their country and land in the British hands”. (From partition of Africa by Prof Sempebwa). (2). Missionaries supplied information to the colonialists which they utilized to plan how to effectively impose their colonial rule on how to crash t...
The Sorry Record of Foreign Aid in Africa August 01, 2001 by James Peron African Governments Are Destroying Their Countries With Foreign Aid For almost half a century the countries of Africa have been awash in aid. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been given to African governments. More billions were lent to these same governments. Countless tons of food have inundated the continent, and swarms of consultants, experts, and administrators have descended to solve Africa’s problems. Yet the state of development in Africa is no better today than it was when all this started. Per capita income, for most of Africa, is either stagnant or declining. Just a few years ago a World Bank report admitted that 75 percent of their African agricultural projects were failures.1 Other aid agencies weren’t any luckier. Operation Mils Mopti in Mali was supposed to increase grain production but the government imposed “official” prices on the grain and had to force farmers into s...
How The IMF, World Bank, and their Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) Destroyed African economies Herbert Jauch , Labour Resource and Research Institute, Namibia Structural adjustment programmes (SAPs) have been implemented in many ‘developing’ countries since the 1980s. They were designed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank and imposed as a condition for further loans. Below is a brief background of the events that led many countries to accept SAPs. It describes how SAPs are being implemented and what results they have produced over the past 20 years. This article also gives a short analysis of the roles of the World Bank, the IMF and the local political elites in this process. Structural Adjustment and the Debt Crisis SAPs were born as a result of a debt crisis that has hit especially developing countries since the 1980s. This debt crisis has its origin in the early 1970s when oil-producing countries that had united in the Organi...
African School Of Grassroots Science A Solid Foundation For Africa's Development Information the West Don't Want You To Know (Part 2) IMPORTANT: Following many messages of gratitude that I've received from around Africa, the America's, Asians, and other formerly colonized nations around the world who read this article, I decided to escalate the message even further. Be informed that this article has long evolved into a book and it could be downloaded for FREE. To download e-book, see details at intellectual slavery, the worst legacy of colonialism . Of course, you may read the short version below, but you'll be missing so much because the ideas were still in formation when this article was written. That's by the way. Attention: African people, Greetings my African people!. This message contains a revelation I received from God in 2012 about why Africa is technologically backward and poor, and also the solution. Of course, I' am not talking abou...
THE WORLD BANK AND THE DENIAL OF AFRICA'S RIGHT TO HEALTH Fact Sheet by Ann-Louise Colgan of Africa Action What is the World Bank? The World Bank is one of the most important financial institutions in the world, and the largest source of development loans for poor countries. Created in 1944, the World Bank and its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), use the loans they provide to developing countries to prescribe policies and major reforms in the economies of these countries. Why is the World Bank Important? Over the past two decades, the poorest countries in the world have turned increasingly to the World Bank and IMF for financial assistance, because their impoverishment has made it impossible for them to borrow elsewhere. The World Bank and IMF use this leverage to dictate these countries' economic policies, and attach strict conditions to their loans which give them great power over borrower governments. The World Bank ...
A Brief History of Slavery in USA Slavery in America began when the first African slaves were brought to the North American colony of Jamestown, Virginia, in 1619, to aid in the production of such lucrative crops as tobacco. Slavery was practiced throughout the American colonies in the 17th and 18th centuries, and African-American slaves helped build the economic foundations of the new nation. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 solidified the central importance of slavery to the South’s economy. By the mid-19th century, America’s westward expansion, along with a growing abolition movement in the North, would provoke a great debate over slavery that would tear the nation apart in the bloody American Civil War (1861-65). Though the Union victory freed the nation’s 4 million slaves, the legacy of slavery continued to influence American history, from the tumultuous years of Reconstruction (1865-77) to the civil rights movement that emerged in the 1960s, a century after...
The Lost History: Who stole black history ? Why was black history stolen ? The science of archaeology, paleontology, and genetics has all proved beyond any doubt that human life originated in Africa. They have all shown that the first humans that ever lived had lived in Africa. See using DNA to trace human origin and migration . Then, click through 1-19 to learn. Alternatively, you may watch the video below. It was summarized in this video (9 minutes only). Human ancestry made easy Despite facts from the science of genetics about human origins, yet western movies, books, continue to present Adam and Eve as whites. Despite facts from archeology and paleontology, yet Hollywood and cinemas continue casting bible characters as whites! Adam and Eve were black- according to science How could Adam and Eve be white; when human life began in Africa? How could Adam and Eve be white; when the first humans lived in Africa? Just think ab...
The World Bank and the development delusion The World Bank can be an effective tool in the fight against poverty with fundamental changes in its power structure The World Bank is headed not by a US military boss or a Wall Street executive, but by an actual expert in the field of development - Jim Yong Kim [EPA] When Jim Yong Kim took the helm of the World Bank in July, progressives in the development community hailed it as a turning point in the fight against poverty. For once the Bank is headed not by a US military boss or a Wall Street executive, but by an actual expert in the field of development. Jeffrey Sachs called Kim's appointment a "tremendous step" toward making the World Bank a place "where the world convenes to address the dire, yet solvable, problems of sustainable development". I have deep respect for Kim and his past accomplishments, but I do not share the optimism that has overcome the development community. I find ...
Thought provoking and factual
ReplyDeleteTotally agree. The Commonwealth should go the way of Empire. The younger generations no longer need the memory of Empire or the concept of Commonwealth to achieve, they can do this through education and hard work. Poor British people also spent centuries fighting for justice and equality. Our ancestors had their masters elite boots on their necks keeping them down.. Only the rich were/are privileged and, as in the past, are totally out of touch with all the citizens who make up this island. Even though this tiny island ruled half the known world it didn't raise their own citizens out of the gutter and poverty. We did that for ourselves, we rose up and demanded our rights. Our determination not to be slaves to the masters set us free. We gave hope to generation after generation and our young people can rise to a personal greatness. Today is today and yesturday is a constant reminder of colonialism. If they gave the British people a vote I'm sure they would vote to leave the Commonwealth. It is built on power and evil and we must destroy it. It's totally irrelevant to the young in our country today. We are not our ancestors.
ReplyDelete